Arkansas PBM law could spur lookalike restrictions

Axios

Reporter: Tina Reed

At least half a dozen states are weighing new restrictions aimed at limiting pharmacy benefit managers' ability to influence drug prices, including prohibitions on steering business to affiliated pharmacies.

Why it matters: With Congress gridlocked on PBM legislation, more states are taking the lead in addressing industry practices that critics say drive up costs and are pushing independent pharmacies out of business.

Driving the news: Last week, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R) signed a first-in-the-nation law barring PBMs from owning pharmacies in that state.

• 39 state attorneys general have urged Congress to enact similar similar curbs, saying the companies "wield outsized power to reap massive profits at the expense of consumers."

  
  

State of play: Among the states that might follow suit is Indiana, which is weighing legislation that would ban PBMs from owning pharmacies or having ownership ties with health carriers.

• Mississippi is working on a measure that would end the practice of "spread pricing," in which PBMs charge an insurer more than they pay a pharmacy for a drug, and pocket the difference. The bill also would restrict patient steering to affiliates and require mandatory data reporting to the state.

• Connecticut, Iowa, Maryland, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Virginia also have bills pending.

• In March, Alabama passed a requirement that PBMs reimburse independent pharmacies at rates no less than those paid by Medicaid.

  
  

Large PBMs often are vertically integrated with insurance carriers, and critics say they're capable of funneling the majority of volume and profits directly to insurers and employers... CONTINUE READING